Cardiac amyloidosis awareness among residents/specialists in Geriatrics: an Italian national survey
Abstract
Objective. Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) among older adults is less infrequent than usually considered, and often underdiagnosed. Geriatricians’ awareness and knowledge of CA is unknown. Objectives of the study are to assess actual CA knowledge among residents/specialists in Geriatrics, and their usual clinical practice in managing suspected CA.
Methods. In this Nation-wide survey carried out by the Italian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics in April-August 2020, we administered to residents/specialists in Geriatrics a questionnaire divided in three sections: socio-demographical, procedural and knowledge. Results were stratified by qualification (resident/specialist) and by performance (best/worst performers).
Results. 289 residents and 104 specialists participated. The overall proportion of correct answers was 57.9% (58.4% residents, 56.1% specialists); knowledge about clinical (89% of correct answers, 91% residents and 84% specialists, P = 0.062), ECG (72% of correct answers, no differences between groups), and echocardiographic (86% of correct answers, no differences between groups) signs of CA was good. However, only 8% participants knew how to diagnose ATTRwt CA (no differences between groups), and 19% which diuretic is indicated in CA (22% residents, 13% specialists, P = 0.069). Only 25% of the participants knew the natural history of ATTRwt (19% residents, 41% specialists, P < 0.001), and 37% was aware of the target of the ATTR treatment. Prevalence of CA was underestimated by 57% specialists and 37% residents (P = 0.001).
Conclusions. Knowledge of CA among residents/specialists in Geriatrics is uncomplete. Education campaigns on this topic are desirable, to improve physicians’ awareness of CA, thus reducing the number of potential misdiagnosis/delay in correct diagnoses.
INTRODUCTION
Amyloidosis is a systemic chronic and progressive disease characterized by extracellular deposition of amyloid, a fibrillar material derived from various precursor proteins, that leads to organ failure 1. Although there are more than 30 different precursor proteins implicated in various amyloid diseases, only 2 types account for over 95% of all cardiac amyloidosis (CA), characterized by diffuse amyloid fibril deposition in the heart causing thickening of both ventricles and appearing phenotypically as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) and transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) 2. AL is a rare disease characterized by a clonal plasma cell disorder due to the overproduction and misfolding of antibody light chain fragments, while ATTR is due to misfolding of the liver-derived precursor protein transthyretin (TTR), either as a hereditary mutant (ATTRm) or as an acquired wild-type variant (ATTRwt) 3. The latter is the most common and typically has its clinical onset in advanced age, with clinical signs of heart failure 4.
Although CA has been considered a rare disease for a long time, recent evidence show that its prevalence has been largely underestimated. In the US, both incidence and prevalence increased over the years, up to a prevalence of about 55 cases per 100,000 persons/year in 2012 5. In older people, the prevalence is probably higher, as reported by several autopsy studies indicating the presence of ATTRwt myocardial deposits in 20-25% of octogenarians 6, and up to 37% in patients older than > 95 years 5.
Being a relatively rarely diagnosed syndrome, the underdiagnosis may be related to the poor awareness of this disease among physicians, bringing to late or no diagnosis. However, little is known about the real knowledge of CA among physicians: a survey on physicians’ attitudes in amyloidosis treatment has been recently performed 7, while only one study assessed knowledge among cardiologists 8.
Given the late clinical manifestations of ATTRwt CA and its common presentation as heart failure, a clinical condition frequently treated by geriatricians 9, it is pivotal for these specialists to suspect this disease when indicated. Therefore, assessing the knowledge about CA among specialists and trainees in Geriatrics, would allow to identify the educational needs in all the phases of these physicians’ training.
The aim of this nationwide Italian survey was to assess the actual knowledge about CA among residents and specialists in Geriatrics, in order to plan instructional programs on this topic, if needed. Secondary aim was to evaluate usual clinical practice in managing suspected CA by these physicians.
METHODS
This National survey was ideated and carried out in Italy from April to August 2020 by the Italian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics (Società Italiana di Gerontologia e Geriatria, SIGG).
The study questionnaire was developed by a consensus group including three Geriatricians expert in CA. It included three sections, using clinical vignettes and multiple-choice answers: the first section collected demographic data, information on working geographical data and setting; the second section included procedural information, exploring education on amyloidosis and clinical attitudes in the management of patients with suspected or diagnosed CA; the third section explored the knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of CA according to the most recent evidences available on this topic. In the design of the latest section, a particular interest was given to the most common types of CA, especially to the ATTRwt, the most widespread in older adults (Supplemental text 1).
This kind of questionnaire proved useful to interpret current practice on the basis of individual experience and culture in previous surveys on geriatric competences among Nephrologists 10, nephrological competences among Geriatricians 11, vaccines and vaccination in older people 12, and heart failure 9.
The secretary of the Society sent an email with an electronic copy of the survey to all the Italian Directors of Internship Programs in Geriatrics who were registered in the membership list of the Society, and to all the members of the National and Regional Governing Councils of the Society. They were invited to participate to the survey and to share the e-mail with the attached survey to all their colleagues being specialists or fellows in Geriatrics.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Quantitative variables were reported using mean and standard deviation, while categorical ones were reported using proportions. All the analyses were performed on the whole sample and stratified according to qualification (specialist vs. resident). Comparison between groups were performed using the t-test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for proportions.
In the third section, we calculated the proportion of correct answers for each question (only one possible correct answer), and a pooled proportion of correct answers.
In order to identify the characteristics of participants needing more educational support, we performed a comparison between participant in the highest (best performers) and lowest (worst performers) quartile of percentage of correct answers.
All the analyses were performed using R software, version 3.6.1 (Vienna, Austria).
RESULTS
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE POPULATION
A total of 393 physicians, 289 residents and 104 specialists, participated to the survey. Mean age of the study population was 34.5 years (SD 9.2); 35% were male. With respect to specialists, residents were younger (45.3 years, SD 11.1 vs 30.6 years, SD 3.6) and less frequently male (42.3 vs 32.3%, P = 0.008), more frequently working in acute care ward (58.7 vs 90.3%), and less frequently in nursing home (13.5 vs 0%), or in outpatient clinic (14.4 vs 5.2%) (P < 0.001) (Tab. I). The distribution of specialists participating to the survey across National macro-areas is reported in Figure 1. Forty-five percent of participants worked in Southern Italy, while 32.8% in Central and 22.1% in Northern Italy, with a higher prevalence of residents in Northern (25.3 vs 13.5%) Italy, and a slight lower prevalence in Central and Southern Italy (P = 0.046) (Tab. I).
EDUCATION AND CLINICAL ATTITUDES FOR CA OF THE POPULATION
Most of the participants obtained information on CA from Pubmed (78.1%, with no differences between residents and specialists), or by individual web search (54.2%; residents 58.8 vs specialists 41.3%, P = 0.003); specialists more frequently studied using material provided by pharmaceutical company representatives (21.2 vs 5.2%, P < 0.001), and using International scientific journals (44.2 vs 30.8%, P = 0.019). Globally, 38.7% of the participants had previously managed patients with CA (60.6% among specialists and 30.1% among residents), 20.6% of which were patients visited for symptoms of heart failure, and 20.1% visited for other diseases, and in 13% of cases it was a first diagnosis of CA. About 68% of participants (74.8% of the specialists and 65% of the residents, P = 0.191) prescribed second level exams with suspected CA regardless of age and comorbidities.
In case of CA with cardiologic symptoms, 59% preferred to manage personally older patients with multimorbidity (no differences between groups), and 41.2% asked for a cardiologic visit to all patients, independently from age or other characteristics (residents 40.1 vs specialists 44.2, P = 0.543).
When visiting patients with features suggestive for CA, screening exams for amyloidosis were prescribed by only 55.1% of the participants, while 26.5% of physicians preferred to firstly treat heart failure symptoms, and prescribed a screening for CA only in case of treatment failure (no differences between groups).
Only 50.9% of participants reported that amyloidosis was included in teaching activities during medical school, and 12% reported that it was never included in their training (8.3 among residents and 22.3% among specialists) (P < 0.001) (Supplemental Table I).
KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CA OF THE STUDY SAMPLE
Overall, the rate of correct answers was 57.9% (58.4% among residents and 56.1% among specialists). However, this result stems from a sharp difference between general knowledge of CA, fair, and that of the diagnostic pathway, such as diagnostic criteria of amyloidosis or scintigraphy interpretation, which was poor. Indeed, the knowledge about clinical (89% of correct answers, 91% among residents and 84% among specialists, P = 0.062), ECG (72% of correct answers, with no differences between groups), and echocardiographic (86% of correct answers, 84% among residents and 91% among specialists, P = 0.091) signs of CA was good. Comparable figures were obtained for the knowledge of the clinical history leading to suspect CA (90% of correct answers, 96% among residents and 75% among specialists), and the diagnostic role of immunofixation in suspected CA (87% of correct answers, no differences between groups). On the other hand, very poor was the knowledge about how to diagnose ATTRwt CA (8% of correct answers, no differences between groups), or about diuretic treatment in patients with CA (19% of correct answers, 22% among residents and 13% among specialists, P = 0.069). Furthermore, only 25% of the participants knew the natural history of ATTRwt (19% among residents and 41% among specialists, P < 0.001), and only 38% how to perform differential diagnosis of CA using bone scintigraphy (30% among specialists and 41% among residents, P = 0.065), and only 37% of participants was aware of the target of the ATTR treatment. Finally, the prevalence of CA was underestimated by 57% specialists and 37% residents (P = 0.001) (Tab. II).
Comparing “best” with “worst” performers, there were no differences in age, sex, and status, despite the former group was slightly younger and included a majority of residents. Best performers worked more frequently in Southern Italy (59 vs 33%, P < 0.001) and in acute care wards (90 vs 81%, P = 0.028), and used more frequently Pubmed to study CA (84.5 vs 73.3%, P = 0.068). There were no differences in clinical experience of CA, while best performers more frequently prescribed second level exams in the case of suspected CA, independently from age and comorbidities (75.3 vs 60.7%, P = 0.048). Finally, best performers more frequently had studied amyloidosis both during medical school and the internship program (30.5 vs 16.7%, P = 0.045).
DISCUSSION
Overall, the participants in this Italian National survey had an uncomplete knowledge of CA, independently from their status of specialist or resident in Geriatrics: despite the good theoretical education on clinical features of this disease, they lacked information on how to diagnose it, especially the ATTRwt, that is the most common form of CA in older adults.
Our data are in line with the results reported by Mircsof et al among 72 Cardiologists working in Switzerland, that showed a wide variation in knowledge and in diagnostic tests used during differential diagnosis of ATTR CA, and concluded that Cardiologists in that country would benefit from information on the latest advances in ATTR 8.
A key result of our survey is the evidence that most physician, independently from their status of resident or specialist, underestimate the prevalence of CA. This indicates that improving the awareness of the physician about the frequency of this disease is pivotal: other studies have shown that there is a delay of up to 39 months from first presentation of cardiac symptoms to CA diagnosis and over 4 years if considering ATTRwt 13.
Furthermore, there is inadequate knowledge on how to diagnose CA and to interpret bone scintigraphy results. This non-invasive diagnostic technique, easy to perform also among older adults 14, has 99% sensitivity and 86% specificity for cardiac ATTR 15 and has been included as a screening tool for ATTR-CA in the 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the treatment of heart failure 16.
Worthy of note also are the really poor physicians’ awareness of how to diagnose ATTRwt, the most common form of CA among older adults 4, and the relatively low number of patients sent for specific treatments (already documented among Cardiologists 8), probably due to the poor knowledge of which is the target for ATTRwt treatment.
All these issues are pivotal considering that new and effective treatments for CA have become available in the latest years. For example, Tafamidis, a tetramer stabilizer that binds with high affinity and selectivity to the thyroxine site of TTR slowing dissociation of TTR tetramers into monomers and preventing aggregation in amyloid fibrils, has been shown to be effective in reducing cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality; it also improves physical performance and quality of life of patients affected by TTR CA 17, and has been approved for treatment of both wild-type and mutated TTR CA 18. Other molecules, such as AG10, another transthyretin tetramer stabilizer, and Patisiran, a transthyretin synthesis inhibitor, have shown promising results, and, currently, are under investigation in phase III trials 18. Furthermore, it should be considered that awareness on CA could help, if diagnosed or even only suspected, in revising carefully the cardiologic drugs used to treat symptoms of heart failure. Indeed, selected drugs, such as non-dihydropyridine calcium channel-blockers and digoxin, could have important adverse effects when used in patients affected by CA 3.
Interestingly, our survey documented that participants having the best performance were slightly younger and more frequently resident, and that there were no differences with respect to worst performers in their personal experience of CA, and best performers more frequently studied CA both during their MD and fellowship. These physicians were also those that more frequently prescribed second level exams for suspected amyloidosis. Thus, our findings once more highlight the importance of an adequate education in CA to improve physicians’ awareness of this disease and, thus, to suspect CA and prescribe second levels exams.
Our study has some weaknesses: firstly, the sampling of the study population mostly included physicians working in University settings, thus leading to a plausible overestimation of the guidelines’ knowledge from the whole cohort of the Italian Geriatricians 19. Nevertheless, this was an obvious selection condition to focus on residents in Geriatrics. Second, it was a questionnaire developed ad hoc for the purpose of this survey, and its clinimetric properties were not evaluated. However, previous experience is consistent with this kind of questionnaire having classificatory properties able to gain insight into the dynamic underlying physician’s awareness of and practice with selected different conditions 9,12. Furthermore, the main aim of the survey was to have an overview of the approach to CA and not a punctual assessment of this disease.
CONCLUSIONS
This Italian National survey highlighted that the knowledge of CA among both residents and specialists in Geriatrics is uncomplete, and, thus, education campaigns on this topic are desirable, with the aim of improving physicians’ awareness of CA, thus reducing the number of potential misdiagnosis or delay in correct diagnoses, and improving quality of life and prognosis of these patients.
Ethical consideration
This research complies with the ethical rules for human experimentation stated in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Acknowledgement
We would like to acknowledge all the Directors of the Italian Internship programs in Geriatrics for their participation to the Survey.
We would like to acknowledge also Gilda Borselli and Letizia Scarpelli for their support for data management. The corresponding author has listed everyone who contributed significantly to the work and has obtained written consent from all contributors who are not authors and are named in the Acknowledgment section.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author contributions
Diana Lelli, Claudio Pedone, Dario Leosco, and Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi contributed to the study conception and design and to the acquisition of data. Data analysis were performed by Diana Lelli, and were interpreted by all the authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Diana Lelli, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding sources and sponsors’ role
This study was supported by a liberal, non-conditioning, educational grant by Pfizer Italia.
Figures and tables
Figure 1.Participation to the survey. Distribution of specialists participating to the survey across National macro-areas. Grey areas indicate regions without participants to the survey.
| Residents | N: 289 | Specialists | N: 104 | All | N: 393 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 30.6 (3.6) | 45.3 (11.1) | 34.5 (9.2) | < 0.001 |
| Male sex N (%) | 93 (32.3) | 44 (42.3) | 137 (34.9) | 0.008 |
| Type of practice, N (%) | ||||
| Outpatient clinic | 15 (5.2) | 15 (14.4) | 30 (7.6) | < 0.001 |
| Acute care ward | 261 (90.3) | 61 (58.7) | 322 (81.9) | |
| Rehabilitation | 3(1) | 2 (1.9) | 5 (1.3) | |
| Nursing home | 0 (0) | 14 (13.5) | 14 (3.6) | |
| Other | 7 (2.5) | 9 (8.6) | 16 (3.1) | |
| No answer | 3(1) | 3 (2.9) | 6 (1.5) | |
| Geographical area, N (%) | ||||
| North | 73 (25.3) | 14 (13.5) | 87 (22.1) | 0.046 |
| Center | 91 (31.5) | 38 (36.5) | 129 (32.8) | |
| South | 125 (43.3) | 52(50) | 177(45) |
| Questions | Residents (%) | Specialists (%) | All (%) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical signs of CA among older adults | 91 | 84 | 89 | 0.062 |
| ECG typical signs of CA | 72 | 69 | 72 | 0.616 |
| Echocardiographic typical signs of CA | 84 | 91 | 86 | 0.091 |
| Prevalence of CA | 37 | 57 | 43 | 0.001 |
| Common arrhythmic/conduction system defects in CA | 69 | 60 | 67 | 0.146 |
| Common features of amyloidosis | 70 | 65 | 69 | 0.487 |
| Amyloidosis AL | 61 | 46 | 57 | 0.011 |
| Amyloidosis ATTR | 65 | 62 | 64 | 0.656 |
| Amyloidosis ATTRwt | 19 | 41 | 25 | < 0.001 |
| Role of serum and urinary immunofixation in suspected CA | 86 | 89 | 87 | 0.423 |
| Instrumental diagnosis of amyloidosis | 58 | 54 | 57 | 0.570 |
| Management of older patient with atrial fibrillation and new onset of heart failure with history of carpal tunnel | 96 | 75 | 90 | < 0.001 |
| Diagnosis of amyloidosis ATTRwt | 9 | 6 | 8 | 0.403 |
| Diuretic treatment in CA | 22 | 13 | 19 | 0.069 |
| Drugs not recommended in CA | 67 | 75 | 69 | 0.210 |
| The target of amyloidosis ATTR treatment | 40 | 30 | 37 | 0.100 |
| Clinical classification of amyloidosis ATTR | 41 | 53 | 45 | 0.050 |
| Prevalence of association between aortic valve stenosis and CA | 56 | 42 | 52 | 0.024 |
| Differential diagnosis of CA from myocardial uptake in bone scintigraphy | 41 | 30 | 38 | 0.065 |
| Tafamidis mechanism of action | 85 | 80 | 84 | 0.330 |
| Abbreviations: AL: light chain; ATTRwt: transthyretin wild type; CA: cardiac amyloidosis; ECG: electrocardiogram | ||||
| Worst performers | Best performers | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 35.6 (10.2) | 33.4 (7.3) | 0.071 |
| Male sex, % | 41 | 33 | 0.295 |
| Resident, % | 70 | 81 | 0.075 |
| Region of working, % | < 0.001 | ||
| Center | 24 | 27 | |
| North | 42 | 14 | |
| South | 33 | 59 | |
| Type of practice, % | 0.028 | ||
| Outpatient clinic | 9 | 2 | |
| Acute care ward | 81 | 90 | |
| Rehabilitation | 2 | 1 | |
| Nursing home | 2 | 0 | |
| No answer | 0 | 4 | |
| Where do you study clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis (more than one answer possible)? | |||
| PubMed | 73.3 | 84.5 | 0.068 |
| Web pages and publications of the Ministry of Health | 10.8 | 19.6 | 0.106 |
| Congresses and training courses | 25 | 16 | 0.120 |
| International Scientific journals | 28 | 33 | 0.466 |
| Individual web search | 53 | 61 | 0.275 |
| If you suspect cardiac amyloidosis: | |||
| You always prescribe second level exams, independently of age and comorbidities, with the exception of terminal patients | 60.7 | 75.3 | 0.048 |
| You prescribe second level exams only for younger patients | 1.7 | 0 | |
| You prescribe second level exams only for patients with good performance status and few comorbidities | 37.6 | 24.7 | |
| In your training, amyloidosis was studied: | |||
| During the MD | 55.8 | 43.2 | 0.045 |
| During the fellowship | 12.5 | 7.4 | |
| Both during the MD and the fellowship | 16.7 | 30.5 | |
| Never, only occasional information during congresses | 15 | 18.9 | |
| In your clinical practice, heart failure is: | |||
| Very common (> 30% of cases) | 71.7 | 66 | 0.781 |
| Common (10-30% of cases) | 19.2 | 22.7 | |
| Uncommon (< 10% of cases) | 7.5 | 8.2 | |
| Very uncommon | 16.7 | 3.1 | |
| No significant differences were reported in experience with patients with cardiac amyloidosis, nor for their clinical management. | |||
References
- Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Lancet. 2016; 387:2641-2654. DOI
- Maleszewski JJ. Cardiac amyloidosis: pathology, nomenclature, and typing. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2015; 24:343-350. DOI
- Donnelly JP, Hanna M. Cardiac amyloidosis: An update on diagnosis and treatment. Cleve Clin J Med. 2017; 84(12):12-26. DOI
- Ruberg FL, Grogan M, Hanna M. Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73:2872-2891. DOI
- Gilstrap LG, Dominici F, Wang Y. Epidemiology of cardiac amyloidosis – associated heart failure hospitalizations among fee-for-service medicare beneficiaries in the United States. Circ Heart Failure. 2019; 12:e005407. DOI
- Tanskanen M, Peuralinna T, Polvikoski T. Senile systemic amyloidosis affects 25% of the very aged and associates with genetic variation in alpha2-macroglobulin and tau: a population-based autopsy study. Ann Med. 2008; 40:232-239. DOI
- Milani P, Gertz MA, Merlini G. Attitudes about when and how to treat patients with AL amyloidosis: an international survey. Amyloid. 2017; 24:213-216. DOI
- Mircsof D. Diagnosis of amyloidosis: a survey of current awareness and clinical challenges among cardiologists in Switzerland. Cardiol Ther. 2020; 9:127-138. DOI
- Lelli D, Pedone C, Leosco D. Management of heart failure: an Italian national survey on fellows/specialists in geriatrics. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020; 32:2049-2055. DOI
- Aucella F, Brunori G, Dalmartello M. Assessment of the geriatric competence and perceived needs of Italian nephrologists: an internet survey. J Nephrol. 2016; 29:385-390. DOI
- Antonelli Incalzi R, Aucella F, Leosco D. Assessing nephrological competence among geriatricians: a proof of concept internet survey. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0141388. DOI
- Ecarnot F, Pedone C, Cesari M. Knowledge about vaccines and vaccination in older people: results of a national survey by the Italian Society for Gerontology & Geriatrics. Vaccine. 2020; 38:1535-1540. DOI
- Lane T, Fontana M, Martinez-Naharro A. Natural history, quality of life, and outcome in cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. Circulation. 2019; 140:16-26. DOI
- Costache II, Buburuz AM, Crisu D. The role of echocardiography and 99mTc-HDP scintigraphy in non-invasive diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98:e17256. DOI
- Gillmore JD, Maurer MS, Falk RH. Nonbiopsy diagnosis of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. Circulation. 2016; 133:2404-2412. DOI
- Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016; 18:891-975. DOI
- Maurer MS, Schwartz JH, Gundapaneni B. Tafamidis treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:1007-1016. DOI
- Macedo AVS, Schwartzmann PV, de Gusmão BM. Advances in the Treatment of Cardiac Amyloidosis. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020;21. DOI
- Kozhimannil KB, Karaca-Mandic P, Blauer-Peterson CJ. Uptake and utilization of practice guidelines in hospitals in the United States: the case of routine episiotomy. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2017; 43:41-48. DOI
Affiliations
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS , 2021
How to Cite
- Abstract viewed - 769 times
- PDF downloaded - 234 times